Thursday, November 15, 2012 | Leave a Comment
Boston Children’s Hospital gets it. So does Brigham and Women’s Hospital. They get the urgency we should all feel about solving the healthcare crisis. Recently, Boston Children’s launched its CLARITY challenge (Children’s Leadership Award for the Reliable Interpretation and appropriate Transmission of Your genomic information), an effort to identify best methods and practices for the analysis, interpretation and reporting of individuals’ DNA sequence. Symbolic of the “open innovation” that many believe is a key to healthcare transformation, Boston Children’s named Brigham and Women’s – ostensibly its competitor –a winner of its challenge.
As this happens more frequently, we are all winners.
The roughly $5.5 trillion healthcare sector is complex, with five major “groups” demanding resources: providers, payers, suppliers, patients and, of course, regulators. Open innovation challenges the industry to see beyond these five silos, removing barriers to discovery. Answers – and, equally important, questions – can come from anywhere.
Consider health insurer Aetna. It recently launched its own “test kitchen” to explore new ways to improve patient outcomes through disease prediction and intervention. From evidence-based cancer treatment to effective use of big data, Aetna seemingly gets the urgency of the healthcare crisis as well, and it’s stepping outside its traditional boundaries to spark innovation.
Another example, ScrubStorm, sparks meaningful innovation among physicians and clinicians. Its founder, Ken Solovay, believes that if clinicians could actually reach out and collaborate with medical device manufacturers it would lead to better solutions. He’s making that happen online right now.
Elsewhere, Transparency Life Sciences claims to be “the world’s first drug development company based on open innovation.” It seeks to address underserved medical needs by “acquiring promising drug compounds, designing studies via crowd-sourced methods and conducting those clinical studies with unmatched productivity.” Its active projects now include Crohn’s disease, Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease.
If you’re tempted to dismiss open innovation as just another fad, consider the story of Adam Foye, a sixth-grader with unexplained muscle weakness who has already benefitted from Boston Children’s CLARITY challenge. Thanks to work done in connection with the challenge, researchers are now much closer to developing therapeutics designed to target Adam’s condition, centronuclear myopathy.
What makes open innovation so exciting is how broadly it spreads opportunity and helps tackle once intractable challenges. And helping this effort are organizations such as The Massachusetts Life Sciences Center (MLSC) that are stepping in to bridge funding gaps. The MLSC recently launched the third round of its Cooperative Research Matching Grant Program, designed to “promote industry-academic research collaborations, support translational research and accelerate the commercialization of promising products, and services.” It will fund up to $250,000 per year if the grantee secures an industry sponsor to match the funds dollar for dollar.
Much more funding – distributed broadly – will be needed, but it’s a start. Even if the dreaded “fiscal cliff” is mere posturing, new models for R&D funding and commercialization are needed. Ironing out the details won’t be easy, but try we must.
As future models emerge, Massachusetts is poised to be THE hub for open innovation in healthcare. Even beyond the obvious collaborators, from Mass General, Brigham & Women’s and Beth Israel Deaconess to Boston’s thriving biotech sector and innovators such as Athenahealth and Medventive, Massachusetts is stacked with leaders such as EMC, Thermo Fisher Scientific and many others that comprise our Commonwealth’s five-category innovation juggernaut.
Decades from now, the Massachusetts Miracle, which has long described our growth in the tech sector during the 80’s, will likely be more closely associated with what is taking place today. As evidenced by the small sample we see so far from initiatives like CLARITY, true miracles – life-saving miracles – will be the enduring legacy of this next statewide boom.
Scott Bauman is executive vice president at Greenough. Follow him on Twitter @sbauman
Friday, April 13, 2012 | Leave a Comment
Each year, when the Boston Marathon rolls around, I feel a renewed sense of pride for the city in which I live. On the third Monday of every April, when elite athletes travel to Boston to compete in the world’s oldest annual marathon, this pride certainly grows stronger and I think, “hey, I live in a pretty cool city.”
Last week I read an article written by the Globe’s Scott Kirsner that reinforced this sentiment, offering up things the Bay State can and should be proud of; not in terms of athletics and traditions, but in terms of technology and innovation. What made the list? Our leadership in life sciences; fostering entrepreneurship; our top notch colleges and universities; our local hangouts, which allow for the exchange of innovative ideas; contribution from big companies such as Microsoft, Raytheon and iRobot and the accomplishments of Terrafugia, the creators of a flying car.
So what about the areas the Bay State needs to work on? Kirsner argued that Massachusetts isn’t creating enough public, economy-invigorating companies, we ignore potentially lucrative consumer-oriented innovation, we make it hard for talented foreign college graduates to remain stateside and we don’t mint enough “angel” investors, who fund cool startups.
As far as the areas in which the Bay State is doing well, a few other areas could have made the list. What about renewable energy and clean technology? Just yesterday, our client Harvest Power, a Waltham-based startup that turns food scraps into energy, received $110 million in series C funding, a milestone that will undoubtedly propel the organic waste industry forward. Or, how about companies like BigBelly Solar which uses solar power to cut waste collection trips by 80%? And, you can’t forget Boston’s robust information technology and cloud computing industry. In addition to the heavy (IT) hitters like EMC and Akamai, cloud start-ups in the Boston area, such as Cloudant, Sonian and Kinvey, are making quite a splash in the industry.
When it comes to innovation, Boston is no Silicon Valley, a sentiment that many Bostonians are probably sick of hearing. But, maybe we don’t want to be Silicon Valley. Massachusetts is a unique area with deep historic roots and is home to many extremely bright individuals. Boston can and should create its own path of innovation, and I would argue that we are already doing this. As Kirsner noted, there are always areas for improvement, but from the work being done to develop breakthrough medical treatments to the conversion of organic waste into energy, we are making great strides just like the marathoners will on Monday.
Jessica Boardman a senior consultant at Greenough. She can be reached via email at email@example.com or follow her on twitter @J_Boardman.