It’s the End of Facebook Gating (as We Know It)

stop sign
stop sign

Early last month Facebook announced that, starting November 5, it will ban like-gating – the practice of offering users a reward for liking a business’ page. For businesses that rely on like-gated apps to build follower counts, this sounds like awful news. However, there are actually a lot of good reasons why like-gating should no longer be a best practice. Let’s check out why. Likes May Not Be as Valuable as You Think

Imagine you were offered the choice between 10 highly qualified leads and 100 mostly unqualified ones: which would you choose? The former, obviously – even if you end up getting 11 qualified leads out of the latter group, that slight increase in value wouldn’t make up for the time you lost sorting through the unqualified ones.

Like-gated Facebook contests – especially those with universally desired prizes, like vacations, sports tickets or consumer electronics – often attract such a broad audience that they produce mostly unqualified leads. What’s more, many of these unqualified leads will immediately unlike your page after they pass the gate and enter your contest, leaving you without even a like for your effort.

Compounding this issue is the fact that even likes from potential leads don’t really have much concrete value anymore. Like count may have once served as a rough proxy for message distribution, but today most brands’ organic reach is only about 3% of their total follower count. If posts aren’t reaching a fanbase organically, then increasing the size of the fanbase (especially with unqualified leads) doesn’t really add much value – better to just pay for distribution to your target group.

Better Ways to Gate Content

Alright, time for the good news: there are lots of alternatives to like-gating, and almost all of them produce more meaningful and valuable results than the system they replace. For example, instead of requiring a like to enter a contest, a business could require that a person join their email list or provide contact information. The truly ambitious could confirm that the entrant is really interested by requiring a response to an automated email to confirm their entry. This practice is typically called “action-gating.”

You could also require that potential entrants visit a landing page on your site to complete their entry. By monitoring the time spent by each user on the landing page, you can estimate how many visitors are actually interested in the information it provides. The landing page could even contain an action gate of its own, such as a survey that needs to be filled out.

In both of these examples, you’re getting a lot more than just a Facebook like – you’re getting valuable personal and behavioral information about your potential customers. This information can then be used to improve both inbound and outbound marketing efforts: refining your email list, targeting your blog content, updating your website, even tweaking your social media strategy. Again, its 10 qualified leads versus 100 random ones – 10 detailed customer profiles are a lot more valuable than 100 Facebook likes.

Owning vs. Renting

Finally, getting rid of like-gating allows marketers to focus more on their owned properties. Instead of requiring people to like your company’s Facebook page – which, no matter how dedicated you are to it, will never be truly yours – you can use Facebook contests as a referral tool for your website, newsletter and other owned media platforms.

We put a lot of time and effort into our social media presences, so it can be easy to forget that they’re not fully ours – we only “rent” them from the network owners, who collect our data as payment. This is a mutually beneficial agreement, to be sure, but it’s important to remember that their TOS allows them to “evict” us at any time and for any reason. Because of this, Facebook provides the most value when it’s driving potential customers to owned properties as quickly as possible.

If you rent an apartment, it’s probably not a good idea for you to spend $20,000 to renovate the kitchen – that money would be better used for a down payment on something you’ll own. You don’t own the likes or your Facebook page, but you DO own your email list, your landing pages, and your lead database. Action-gated contests help the former build the latter.

Like-Gating Is Dead: Long Live Action-Gating

The end of like-gating is a good thing because it forces us to take a critical look at how we measure the value of our social media programs. Likes are only one of many different KPIs we can use to judge the effectiveness of our social spend – and, as has been argued here, they may not even be the best one. Through questioning their value, as the end of like-gating has forced us to do, we can discover ways to improve both our programs and our performance metrics.

What are your thoughts on the end of like-gating? Let us know in the comments!

Zach Pearson is an Account Executive - Content at Greenough. Follow him on Twitter: @zach_p_pearson

What Better Place to Talk about Facebook than…Twitter?

Anne blog chart_9.13
Anne blog chart_9.13

In addition to Greenough’s social media listening platform, I love playing with tools, widgets and apps out there to test out hypotheses and satisfy my pangs of curiosity. One tool I’m a fan of is a free Twitter analytics service called Topsy. Yesterday, I was playing with keywords and testing different “rivalries” to see how they played out on Twitter. Purely to satisfy my own whim, I compared the number of times Twitter users mentioned the words “Twitter,” “Facebook” and “LinkedIn” during the past month.

A couple of noteworthy observations and patterns that piqued my interest:

  • At only one point during the entire month does Facebook fall out of first place as the more-frequently-mentioned social network among Twitter users (on August 18).
  •  Unlike a lot of closely-related topics (e.g. Democrats and Republicans), Facebook and Twitter generally don’t follow the same patterns of ups and downs.
  • Mentions of Twitter declined sharply on Fridays, while mentions of Facebook tended to trend downward on Saturdays.
  • LinkedIn is mentioned significantly less than Facebook or Twitter.

One might think that Twitter (the topic) would be discussed more among Twitter users than Facebook (the topic), but that’s not the case. How come? I couldn’t leave well enough alone, so I did some digging and musing to try to identify some possible contributing factors.

Potential reasons why Facebook may have edged out Twitter in mentions:

  • When someone talks about Twitter, often they’ll just talk about tweets without saying where they were tweeted (for humans, Twitter’s the only place you can tweet); With Facebook, you use regular verbs that still require you to include the word “Facebook.” E.g. We liked the page on Facebook; He posted the photo on Facebook; I updated my status on Facebook.
  • There are more aspects of Facebook to master, meaning that there are more tips, tricks, questions, etc. floating around out there.
  • Facebook has more users than Twitter, so it stands to reason that it’d have more mentions, even within the Twitter channel. Facebook is not as open as Twitter and information doesn’t flow as freely, so Twitter is an easier channel through which to seek information or search for like-minded users.
  • Facebook is just in the news more than Twitter – IPO, privacy issues.
  • Promoting Facebook contests/giveaways

LinkedIn is no small potatoes in the social realm, so why is it barely a blip on the radar when tracking mentions on Twitter? I have a few guesses, but what do YOU think? Share your thoughts in the comment section on this or on any of the other observations that beg for further explanation.

-- Anne Norris is a senior consultant, digital and social media. Follow Anne on Twitter: @anne_norris